401(k) Calculator

Project a 401(k) to retirement with the 2026 contribution limits applied properly — including the age-50 catch-up and the higher 60-to-63 catch-up — and see how much of the ending balance is your money rather than growth.

Tax year 2026 Contribution limits from IRS Notice 2025-67 Last reviewed:

Your plan and assumptions

You
Contributions

Used when contributing as a percentage.

Used when contributing a fixed amount instead.

Employer match

Of what you contribute. 100 means dollar for dollar.

From your plan documents — there is no standard formula.

Assumptions

Planning assumption, before fees. Not a forecast.

Fund expense ratios plus any plan administration charge.

Planning assumption.

Used to restate the ending balance in today's money.

Decides whether catch-up contributions must be Roth. Only relevant if you are 50 or over.

On this page
  1. The 2026 contribution limits
  2. What the calculator does with a contribution above the limit
  3. Roth catch-up contributions above $150,000
  4. How the projection is built
  5. A worked example
  6. What this does not model
  7. Frequently asked questions
  8. Related calculators

The 2026 contribution limits

For 2026 the elective deferral limit — the most you may put in from your own pay across all 401(k), 403(b), and governmental 457(b) plans — is $24,500. From age 50 a catch-up of $8,000 is added on top, taking the total to $32,500.

There is a third tier. In the calendar year you turn 60, 61, 62, or 63, the catch-up rises to $11,250, giving a limit of $35,750. It drops back to the ordinary catch-up in the year you turn 64. This higher catch-up is something a plan may offer rather than something every plan does, which is why there is a checkbox for it rather than an assumption.

Two further limits sit above those. Employee and employer money together may not exceed $72,000 in one plan for the year (catch-up contributions sit outside that ceiling), and a plan may not take account of compensation above $360,000 — which quietly caps a percentage-of-pay match for high earners. All four figures come from IRS Notice 2025-67.

What the calculator does with a contribution above the limit

It tells you. A calculator that silently trims your input to the legal maximum leaves you thinking you asked for something you did not get, so this one shows the contribution you entered, the limit that applies to your age, the amount above it, and the figure actually used in the projection.

The limit is then applied in every year of the projection, not just the first. A rising salary eventually pushes a percentage contribution into the cap, and the projection reflects that rather than quietly exceeding the law for twenty years.

Roth catch-up contributions above $150,000

Under section 414(v)(7), a participant whose Social Security wages from the plan-sponsoring employer in the previous calendar year exceeded $150,000 must make catch-up contributions as designated Roth. For 2026, the test looks at 2025 wages.

This changes the tax treatment, not the amount: the catch-up still counts, it just goes in after tax and comes out tax-free. Enter last year's wages and the results panel will tell you whether it applies to you.

How the projection is built

The model runs one year at a time. Your contribution is taken from that year's salary and capped at the deferral limit for your age. The employer match is added under the formula you entered. The balance grows at the expected return, the annual fee is taken off the resulting balance, and salary grows into the next year.

Fees are charged on the balance rather than on the contribution, because that is how expense ratios and plan administration charges actually work — and it is why they matter far more later, when the balance is large, than in the early years.

The inflation-adjusted figure divides the ending balance by (1 + inflation)years, restating it in today's money. Over thirty years at 2.5% that roughly halves the headline number, and it is the more useful figure for deciding whether the plan is enough.

A worked example

Age 35, retiring at 65, $92,000 salary, $48,000 already saved, contributing 10% with a 50% match up to 6% of pay, 7% return, 0.4% fees, 3% salary growth.

The first year contributes $9,200 of your own money and $2,760 from the employer, well under the $24,500 limit. Thirty years later the projection lands near $1.7 million, of which roughly $428,000 is your contributions, $128,000 is employer money, and $1.2 million is growth. Fees take about $95,000 along the way.

Restated in today's money at 2.5% inflation that $1.7 million is closer to $816,000. Both numbers are true; the second is the one to plan with.

Notice the fee figure. Four tenths of one percent, charged annually on a growing balance, costs more than a fifth of what the employer contributed over the same period. Raising it to 1% — not unusual in a small plan — costs well over $200,000 of the ending balance.

What this does not model

  • Market variability. A steady 7% every year is a modelling convenience. Real sequences of returns produce a wide range of outcomes around the same average, and a bad decade near retirement matters far more than a bad decade at the start.
  • Future limit increases. The 2026 limits are held flat across the projection. They are usually adjusted for inflation, so a long projection understates what you will actually be allowed to contribute.
  • Tax on withdrawal. Traditional 401(k) money is taxed as ordinary income when it comes out. The Roth vs traditional comparison handles that question directly.
  • Vesting. Employer money is included in full. If you leave before you are fully vested, some of it is forfeited — the employer match calculator shows the vested figure.
  • Loans, hardship withdrawals, and required minimum distributions. None is modelled.

For the whole picture including Social Security and the drawdown years, use the retirement calculator. See our sources for every figure used here and methodology for how they are verified.

Frequently asked questions

How much can I contribute to a 401(k) in 2026?

$24,500 of your own pay, plus an $8,000 catch-up from age 50, plus a higher $11,250 catch-up instead of the $8,000 in the years you are 60 to 63 — if your plan offers it.

Employer contributions are on top of that. The combined ceiling for one plan is $72,000, with catch-up contributions sitting outside it.

Does the employer match count towards my contribution limit?

Not towards the $24,500 elective deferral limit, which applies only to money you defer from your own pay. It does count towards the $72,000 combined limit on everything going into the plan.

For nearly everyone the second limit is theoretical. It binds mainly for high earners in plans with large profit-sharing contributions.

What is the 60-to-63 catch-up and does it apply to me?

It is a higher catch-up limit — $11,250 for 2026 instead of $8,000 — for participants who reach age 60, 61, 62, or 63 during the year. It reverts to the ordinary catch-up in the year you turn 64.

It is optional for plans. Check your summary plan description before counting on it, and untick the box on this page if your plan does not offer it.

Why does the projection subtract fees from the balance rather than the contribution?

Because that is how they are charged. Fund expense ratios and plan administration fees are levied as a percentage of assets, so they grow as the balance grows.

It also explains why fees matter so much more than they appear to. Half a percent sounds trivial against a 7% return; compounded on a balance that reaches seven figures, it costs a substantial share of the final result.

Should I contribute more than the match?

Capturing the full match first is close to unarguable — it is an immediate return on your own contribution that nothing else matches. Beyond that it becomes a question about your marginal tax rate, your other goals, and what your plan charges.

A plan with high fees and poor fund choices is a weaker home for money above the match than an IRA. A cheap plan with index funds usually is not.

Is the projected balance before or after tax?

Before. A traditional 401(k) balance is taxed as ordinary income when withdrawn, so the figure shown overstates what you can actually spend.

A Roth 401(k) balance of the same size is worth more, because qualified withdrawals are tax-free. That difference is exactly what the Roth vs traditional comparison quantifies.